Leeg

AKT

Lesbar auf Smart Phone. Texte laufen auf Smart Phone länger, brauchen Überlauf.

Allgemeine Kosmos-Theorie

AKT

akt2

Physics - Development

explaining nature as a oneness

Quantum physics - Macrophysics

AKT

Written for normal people,

interested in theoretical physics.

Micro-Cosmos, Macro-Cosmos

Question and Answer

Issue: AKT, Allgemeine Kosmos-Theorie

Question: What is new about AKT ? In which regard does AKT differ most from nowadays physics?

Answer: Two big news can be told,

answer A1 to question Q1 (see akt1.jaaaa.net, micro-cosmos) and answer A2 to question Q2 (see below A2, see also akt2.jaaaa.net, macro-cosmos). The two theories are independant from each other. They can be right or wrong (or partly right, partly wrong) independant from each other.

A1. There is now an answer to the question Q1: ‘How can bodies come to know, if they have to attract or repulse each other, and furthermore, with which strength they have to attract or to repel each other over a distance d (10 m, 100 m or a light year), dependant upon d and further factors. Can they see each other? How does the decision process run?’ The body-interaction-question has got an answer.

The answer of nowadays physics is a dispair answer: ‘It happens. We don’t know, how.’ Earlier, ether-theories have been tried. Descartes tried an ether-theory, Newton tried 3 ether-theories. All of them wrecked. All of them ended in internal contradictions. Einsteins answer, ‘body b1 is curving space and the curved space is influencing body b2’ is also a kind of ether theory. This theory wrecks already at the earliest possible stage: space cannot be curved. A stick can be curved (in space). A piece of space cannot be curved (in space). Application of the verb ‘curve’ to ‘space’ is not defined. The combination of the two words produces nonesense. However, the case is very special. Einstein has got grip on a small piece of the truth. (After disclosure of the core of AKT you can see, why. The acting entity is calculating.) Therefore the mathematical elaboration of his theory is to a certain degree successful. ‘The most successful error, ever made’, you could say. What Einstein really did: he thought a kind of gum lying in space. Gum as intermediator. Moving gum particles, a kind of ether! But there is no gum, lying in space. Of course Einstein omitted to describe the process of a body curving the gum. For he was unable to describe this process. He only postulated, that a body is able to curve the gum-space over a distance in his neigbourhood. He shifted the problem without solving it. AKT really solves the problem. AKT does not rape space and time, what Einstein did. With support of modern terms AKT describes the process in such a manner that everybody can understand it. See akt1 and akt1e !

A2.. There is now a new model answering to the question Q2, how galaxies and clouds of galaxies function, explaining a lot of properties of galaxies, which astronomers can see via their telescopes, f.i. the disc form of a galaxy, f.i. 2 bowed arms of a galaxy, never 1 arm alone, never 3 arms or more, always 2 arms. In a later phase no arms. AKT solves the ‘winding problem’. AKT reveals the Dark Matter problem as a pseudo-problem. The AKT-model of the macrocosmos explains, how galaxy forms develope out of each other.

Nowadays physics has no answers to these subquestions to question Q2.

The cosmology of AKT, with the galaxy model in the middle, is broad described on the website www.akt2.jaaaa.net. An animation of the process is prepaired and not yet ready.

The large number of new answers to questions, unanswered until now, makes it very probable, that the macro-cosmos picture of AKT hits into the black.

Before going on with A2, let’s go back to A1 for a moment !

A1. ff. In my best years, between 22 and 32, when busy with physics and philosophy, I was not able to find the answer to Q1. The question arose, but the answer didn’t appear. When it appeared finally, with 71, about 40 rsp. 50 years later, it didn’t appear directly. First I got attent on a possibility P of body movement, clearly ’forgotten’, clearly too near before our nose to be seen. After a year, focussing on P, while working the new model out, a piece of the answer to Q1 (body interaction) began to dawn. I needed some months more to get the answer clear. Thus: the access to the answer is hidden dubble and threefold and difficult to find.

But don’t mind: When it is told to you, you will understand the answer directly.

It’s well known that Newton tried hard to find the answer A(Q1). (body interaction). He developed 3 ether-theories, which all ended in contradictions. Finally he dispaired, saying: ‘Only God knows. It’s the will of god, that bodies interact as they do.’ But with the new answer A(Q1) no god is needed to explain the process. In our time it is much easier to understand, because we have more thinking tools than people earlier. It was an enormous performence of Newton to find the first arm of the gravitation phenomenon, responsible for attraction. He formulated the mathematical law, which describes the process very well. But not optimal.

In the optimal description, coming with AKT, the law is applicable to all processes, in the micro-world and in the macro-world. Because of the missing last bit of precision, Newtons law cannot describe the micro-processes correctly. It does not describe the repulsion arm of body interaction, hidden in ‘nano’-dimensions.

In the science field, precision is very important. Always I have layed the demand on myself to work with utmost precision. When the work is really done? When can we be content? When can we close a question list or question book? The answer is: When the process in question is fully described, without interruptions, without missing pieces, then the book can be closed. Process-philosophy is my name for this endevour to fill all gaps until the very last. Newton and many physicists after him waived the claim to describe the interaction process between bodies in dispair: ‘No interaction process to find!’

In my time between 22 and 32, I too did not succeed in finding the answer to question Q1. But I found an answer to another question, which may have helped indirectly now. Over many years I was busy with knowledge theory: ‘How do we think?’ and developed a brain model, in which 10 elementary thinking steps are composing the (already complex) basis-thinking processes. In the brain research earlier and in the physics research now I applied the same research strategy: the black-box-strategy: ‘There is a black box. We know (more or less) the input. We know (more or less) the output. What is happening inside?’ And then the exacerbated question: ’What must happen inside?’ Stiffening the question in this way is important, is the way to get results, we can rely upon.

Observations (of input and output) are always uncertain to a certain extent. For they have to be interpreted. Answers to the ’What must happen inside?’-question are sure. Firmly the researcher can rely on these answers.

The findings in the earlier work were layed down in a 300 pages book with the title “Kybernetik des Gehirns. Wie wir denken, was wir denken.” 50 pages of pure philosophical content were stripped, 250 pages technical content were sent as patent application to the patent-office. “The biggest application ever delivered!” was the comment in the office.

At that time the technology was not yet ripe to realize the structures of the ‘parallel-computer’, of the ‘artificial brain’ as dense as in our biological brain. And it is not yet ripe now.

After the success of the ‘DNA-project’ Obama has announced a ‘brain-project’. In the context of this new mega-project, with investions of some billion $, the early work could get a late reward.

Knowing more about thinking processes clearly improves the own think-activities. The brain is a tool. Knowing it from inside enables us to use it more skillfully.

The language used in developing a complex theory is a tool more, is a tool T2, helping the tool T1 (the brain) to fulfill a task. T1-T2-interaction! While developing the new physics I used the German language, the most brillant language i know. Before the war the German language has been the leading science-language in the world. I don’t know if it was a wise decision to abandon this brillant language tool because of the Hitler-war, which has a not yet disclosed background. Hitler seems to have been the Trojan horse of a secret party wanting to get grip on Europe. In each case the English language, dominant now, which I use here to describe the results, is less practical for the fine work.

The answer A1 to question Q1 belongs to the core of the AKT-model and is now (2013) not yet fully disclosed here, but will be disclosed in the full paper. End Q1, A1 ff.

Let’s returm to Q2 and A2, to cosmology. There we encounter the necessity to introduce the second arm of the gravitation phenomenon, getting active inside black holes. It’s a typical outcome of a black-box-situation and the question-technology: ‘What must happen in the center of a galaxy G to explain the output (seen by Hubble)?’ Repulsion must occur! Falling together, disappearing in a black hole, has one direction only. In due time the opposite direction must get a chance!

Known gravity is the only force with only one arm. Why should we not recover symetry of nature by installing the second arm inside the black hole? It fits perfectly! Now the model gets vivacious! Construction, composition of pieces, is a form of thinking, a speculative activity with a trial and error component. It’s an unevitable step to get results. (But it should be led by firm facts! See later!)

The best way to visualize the processes in a black hole, giving birth to a galaxy, is by animation. While this phantastic tool to transfer complex information in a nutshell is not yet ready, you can get an idea of the tool by visiting the (www.)Albatross-windmachine (.jaaaa.net) , another result of longtime work of the author, decorated with the int. innovation-price of DSM.

In the meantime i can describe processes in galaxies with words. A galaxy is a big fether swinging, with an oscillation frequency of 10¹⁰ years. Because of our short life span we see mainly frozen situations. In the tijdshrinker we can follow the process, taking place in 10¹⁰ years, in some minutes.

A black hole first is an assemblage of nucleons, stripped from their electrons.

A black hole keeps swallowing star after star, sun after sun, and gets bigger. In a certain stage of the growing process, suddenly, it starts shrinking enormously. What has happened inside? Under the pressure, produced by gravitation-attraction of the enormous masses, in the places of the greatest forces in the whirling-processes inside, the complex inside structure of the nucleons collapses. Now the bh consists partly of nucleons (stripped from electrons), and collapsed nucleons, 5000 times denser than nucleons, smaller particles, pushed nearer together by the pressure from outside.

Iterating the picture of an atom, seeing the known nucleon parts neutrons and protons as atoms, we can imagine the n-electron-shells of the neutrons and protons collapsing, neutrons and protons being reduced to their heavy n-nucleons (n-nucleon = nucleon of the nucleon, n-electron = nucleair electron).

As long as the pressure from outside stays in place, the collapsed condition continues. But anti-forces are trying steadily to rebuild the collapsed structures. Each collapsed n-nucleon is a fether trying to extent. Such a tight fether can be seen as a piece of gunpowder.

Imagine the power of 1000 kg chemical gunpowder, dynamite or TNT.

Imagine the power of 1000 kg Uranium U235 ‘gunpowder’! (Atom-bomb)

Imagine the power of 1000 kg Waterstof H ‘gunpowder’! (H-bomb).

Multiply the power of the last gunpowder with the factor 5000. Then you get the power of 1000 kg ‘fethers’, being enclosed in a pressure bottle, wanting to extent.

Now imagine a ball as big as the moon, filled with such tight fethers. Such a ball is like a small sandcorn in a giant bh, having swallowed 10.000 or more suns. Millions of such sandcorns of the bigness of the moon and others of the bigness of the earth are whirling around in a giant bh together with normal nucleons, in some regions of a bit less pressure extending to normal nucleons, in other regions again collapsing to 5000 times denser gunpowder. Imagine these boiling processes inside a bh with a diameter of some million kilometers!

Which are main factors, guiding the processes inside and outside?

A star falling into a bh comes with great velocity. Entering not in the middle, but at one side, he gives the bh a spin. If, caused by preprocesses, most of the stars enter at the same side, the bh gets a big spin around a certain axis. In a spinning ball movable masses are trying to get to the periphery, away from the axis, then are pushed upwards to the poles, then stream along the axis back to the center. This whirl process makes the axis the place of minimal pressure. That’s why most eruptions of gunpowder happen inside the axis, which might have a diameter of some hundred km in a bh with a diameter of some million km.

As long as the giant forces of gravitation-attraction (first arm of the gravitation phenomenon) govern the processes, the eruptions (caused by the second arm of the gravitation phenomenon) don’t penetrate the bh-surpace. They are caught back by the pressure as bubbles in a bottle of water, juist starting to boil. Swallowing more stars, the balance inside the bh between gravitation-attraction and gravitation-repulsion is shifting to the side of repulsion. As long as attraction is dominating, the bh stays stable. As soon as the balance mark has crossed to the side, where repulsion is dominating, eruptions penetrate the bh-surface at the poles of the spinning ball. A cosmic rifle-fire starts, which can be seen and photographed by Hubble. The bh developes 2 fire arms at opposite sides. The axis becomes a dubble-gun, shooting in opposite directions. While a giant blast of extenting nnucleons is filling the axis, some 100 km broad, some million km long, a blast, racing to the poles, penetrating the poles, big blocks of nucleons are pushed by the whirl from the sides into the racing stream, are dragged along and accelerated by the stream and finally thrown out through the pole-opening into space, forming a visible string of hot, light emitting matter. The nnucleons in the string recover to nucleons, the nucleons recover to atoms, emitting spectral lines, which we can analyse. So we come to know, which elements are present there, elements, which will cluster together to stars in the next million years coming. They all are travelling on a ray, going through the center of the bh. They don’t rotate around the bh, but are travelling away from the bh-center. For they were thrown out there with high velocity by the second arm of gravity, by gravitation-repulsion.

These are the over-all-processes, where the bh has a big spin, opening two gates for exploding gunpowder.

But what happens, when the bh doesn’t rotate? No spin present! Can that happen?

Go on here: ( akt2-1-micro-macro-cosmos-question-answer-gb ), (www.akt2-1.jaaaa.net) .

End akt2 ————— more .